Yesterday, felt like a darn near firestorm of comments over my post, showing concern about the warning signs at California's first hydrogen gas station on Santa Monica Blvd. in Los Angeles.
I like many who have seen the signs, expressed concern, which certain readers here put to rest.
So I woke up thinking about our energy needs. And how it makes sense to acknowledge sacrifices and risks in order to get off fossil fuels, which could mean algae, solar, wind, battery-powered and hydrogen-powered cars and more.
Depending on where we live.
Born and bred in California, I know solar is our energy answer. (It's also our problem with growing drought)
Travel to Pacific Northwest, and you see energy powered by water by dams.
Travel to Nova Scotia, and you see energy powered by tidal waves at the Bay of Fundy.
Travel to Denmark, energy by wind.
Travel to Singapore, energy by solar.
And so on...
I think when considering this massive Hydrogen Highway plan, it'd be most useful to focus first on major cities in states (and countries) that don't have access to creating safe, renewable energy.
I'm saying this if funds and resources are limited in the beginning. And I'm thinking they must be limited with our economic climate effecting car manufacturers.
So why don't the GMs and Fords of the world, focus on rolling our their hydrogen vechicles and infrastructure in areas that aren't rich in other natural resources.
And simultaneously work on an all-electric car for areas like California with a plentiful renewable energy source, the sun.
Continue reading "Cars & Energy Use Depending Upon Where We Live " »
Recent Comments